Skip to content
logo MSD Oncology Clinical Trials
  • Inicio
  • Estudios
    • Menú principal
    • Descripción general de la prueba
    • Cabeza y Cuello
    • Colorretal
    • Esofágico
    • Gástrico
    • Ginecológico
    • Hematológico
    • Hígado y Vías Biliares
    • Mama
    • Melanoma
    • Pediátrico
    • Próstata
    • Pulmón
    • Riñón
    • Tumores Sólidos
    • Vejiga
  • Acerca De
  • Preguntas Frecuentes
  • Para Profesionales De Cuidados De La Salud
  • Español (LatAm)
    • Back
    • English
    • English (AU)
    • Español (LatAm)
    • Français (FR)
    • Português (BR)

Study Keyword: Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection

The purpose of this study is to assess the antitumor efficacy and safety of perioperative enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab and radical cystectomy (RC) + pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) compared with the current standard of care (neoadjuvant chemotherapy [gemcitabine plus cisplatin] and RC + PLND) for participants with MIBC who are cisplatin-eligible. The dual primary hypotheses are preoperative EV + pembrolizumab and RC + PLND (Arm A) will achieve superior pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and perioperative EV and pembrolizumab and RC + PLND (Arm A) will achieve superior event free survival (EFS) compared with neoadjuvant gemcitabine + cisplatin and RC + PLND (Arm B).

Study Keyword: Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection

Perioperative Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Cisplatin-eligible Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

March 10, 2022

By Support_Clique

The purpose of this study is to assess the antitumor efficacy and safety of perioperative enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab and radical cystectomy (RC) + pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) compared

logo-white MSD Oncology Clinical Trials
  • Política de privacidad de MSD
  • Términos de uso
  • Preferencias de cookies
  • Accesibilidad

Copyright © 2023 Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA and its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Accesibilidad

Accesibilidad