Skip to content
logo MSD Oncology Clinical Trials
  • Home
  • Trials
    • Main Menu
    • Trial Overview
    • Bladder
    • Breast
    • Colorectal
    • Esophageal
    • Gastric
    • Gynecologic
    • Head and Neck
    • Hematologic
    • Kidney
    • Liver and Bile Duct
    • Lung
    • Melanoma
    • Pediatric
    • Prostate
    • Solid Tumors
  • About
  • Common Questions
  • For HCPs
  • English
    • Back
    • English
    • English (AU)
    • Español (LatAm)
    • Français (FR)
    • Português (BR)

Condition: Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

The purpose of this study is to assess the antitumor efficacy and safety of perioperative enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab and radical cystectomy (RC) + pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) compared with the current standard of care (neoadjuvant chemotherapy [gemcitabine plus cisplatin] and RC + PLND) for participants with MIBC who are cisplatin-eligible. The dual primary hypotheses are preoperative EV + pembrolizumab and RC + PLND (Arm A) will achieve superior pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and perioperative EV and pembrolizumab and RC + PLND (Arm A) will achieve superior event free survival (EFS) compared with neoadjuvant gemcitabine + cisplatin and RC + PLND (Arm B).

Condition: Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Perioperative Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Cisplatin-eligible Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

March 10, 2022

By Support_Clique

The purpose of this study is to assess the antitumor efficacy and safety of perioperative enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab and radical cystectomy (RC) + pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) compared

logo-white MSD Oncology Clinical Trials
  • MSD Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences
  • Accessibility

Copyright © 2023 Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA and its affiliates. All rights reserved.

eSSENTIAL Accessibility

eSSENTIAL Accessibility